![]() ![]() Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–27 In: Thomas L, Suddaby R, Leca B (eds) Institutional work: actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of organizations. Lawrence T, Suddaby R, Leca B (2009) Introduction: theorizing and studying institutional work. In: Clegg SR, Hardy C, Lawrence T, Nord WR (eds) Handbook of organization studies. Lawrence T, Suddaby R (2006) Institutions and institutional work. Kompatsiaris P (2017) The politics of contemporary art biennials. Kompatsiaris P (2014) ‘To see and be seen’: ethnographic notes on cultural work in contemporary art in Greece. Kolb L, Flückiger G (2013/December) (New)Institution(alsim). Kimball W (2012, June 18) Berlin Biennale may adopt OWS’s horizontal power structure. Holm N, Duncan P (2018) Introduction: cultural studies, Marxism and the exile of aesthetics. Holm P (1995) The dynamics of institutionalization: transformation processes in Norwegian fisheries. In: Filipovic E, van Hal M, Øvstebø S (eds) The biennial reader. ![]() Hlavajova M (2010) How to biennial: a consideration of the biennial in relation to the art institution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 262–283 In: Thomas L, Suddaby R, Leca B (eds) Institutional work: actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Hirsch P, Bermiss S (2009) Institutional “dirty” work: preserving institutions through strategic decoupling. Gupta S (2015) Pixação and Tourist Appraisal. ![]() Green C, Gardner A (2016) Biennials, triennials, and Documenta: the exhibitions that created contemporary art. Gilman-Opalsky R (2011) Spectacular capitalism: guy Debord and the practice of radical philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstokeįoster H (1983) The anti-aesthetic: essays on postmodern culture. Penn State Press, University Parkįisher E (2010) Media and new capitalism in the digital age: the spirit of networks. Sage, CaliforniaĮlkins J, Montgomery H (eds) (2013) Beyond the aesthetic and the anti-aesthetic, vol 4. Verso, Londonĭimitrakaki A (2012) Art, globalisation and the exhibition form: what is the case, what is the challenge? Third Text 26(3):305–319ĭu Gay P, Pryke M (eds) (2002) Cultural economy: cultural analysis and commercial life. Princeton University Press, Princetonĭebord G (1967/1998) Comments on the the Society of the Spectacle. Les presses du reel, DijonĬurrid-Halkett E (2017) The sum of small things: a tsheory of the aspirational class. University of California Press, Los Angeles & Londonīourriaud N (2002) Relational aesthetics. Princeton University Press, Princetonīorn G (1995) Rationalizing culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the institutionalization of the musical Avant-Garde. ![]() Verso, Londonīoltanski L, Thevenot L (2006) On justification. Suhrkamp Verlag, Berlinīoltanski L, Chiapello E (2005) The new spirit of capitalism. Coach House Books, Torontoīöhme G (2003) Contribution to the critique of the aesthetic economy. Keywordsīalzer D (2014) Curationism: how curating took over the art world and everything else. We discuss our findings and link the micro-institutional logics to broader macro-level logics of aesthetic capitalism and spectacle. These three rationales concomitantly and decisively structured the event’s public performance and turned the idea of linking art to activism into the spectacle of a human zoo. Drawing from empirical vignettes, we identify three institutional rationales that coexisted, clashed, and mutually displaced this logic, reaffirming rather than disrupting the idea that art has to preserve some distance from social reality, that neo-anarchist activism should prefigure social reality in the here and now, and that the configuration of the above through the organization’s politics of visibility that promotes the spectacle of the Berlin Biennale and itself as a brand. We explore the outcome of curators’ attempts to disrupt existing practices by introducing the logic of activism. In this chapter, we draw from ethnographic observation of the 7th Berlin Biennale (2012) that took place in the context of a rising anti-capitalist discourse reflected in the Occupy movement and the movement of the squares. Rather than acting as mere aesthetic containers, these shows aspire to be socially relevant by raising questions about capitalism, colonialism, inequality, environmental devastation, and gender imbalances. In recent decades, the biennial has become the most widespread mode of showcasing contemporary art. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |